EDB — 2DJ

view in whole PDF view in whole HTML

View

English

Remark 2

[2DJ]Given a set \(I⊂ℝ\) there are various ways of saying that a function \(f:I→ℝ\) is monotonic. Let’s first list the different types of monotonicity

\begin{align} ∀ x,y∈ I,& x{\lt}y ⟹ f(x)≤ f(y) \label{eq:deb_ cresc}\\ ∀ x,y∈ I,& x{\lt}y ⟹ f(x){\lt} f(y) \label{eq:strett_ cresc}\\ ∀ x,y∈ I,& x{\lt}y ⟹ f(x)≥ f(y) \label{eq:deb_ decresc}\\ ∀ x,y∈ I,& x{\lt}y ⟹ f(x){\gt} f(y) \label{eq:strett_ decresc} \end{align}

Unfortunately in common use there are different and incompatible conventions used when naming the previous definitions. Here is a table, in which every convention is a column.

??

non-decreasing

increasing

weakly increasing

??

increasing

strictly increasing

strictly increasing

??

non-increasing

decreasing

weakly decreasing

??

decreasing

strictly decreasing

strictly decreasing

In this text, the convention in the last column is used.

(The first column is, in my opinion, problematic. It often leads to the use, unfortunately common, of phrases such as ”\(f\) is a non-decreasing function” or ”we take a function \(f\) not decreasing”; this can give rise to confusion: seems to say that \(f\) does not meet the requirement to be ”decreasing”, but it does not specify whether it is monotonic. People who follow the convention in the first column (in my opinion) should always say ”monotonic”).

Download PDF
Bibliography
Book index
  • monotonic
  • increasing
  • decreasing
  • real numbers
Managing blob in: Multiple languages
This content is available in: Italian English